Evidence library · DOC-0111

Facebook: solicitor response update

Source date: 8 Oct 2026 · Facebook captures (saved date)

The saved published post and accompanying comments, organised in reading order.

These are saved captures of the posts and replies. Capture dates identify the versions held in the archive and do not necessarily establish the original publication dates. Screenshots preserve the saved post and discussion. Unrelated Facebook interface and Kay’s surname are omitted where necessary. Text extraction can contain recognition errors; consult the screenshot for exact wording.

Post

Saved published post

Saved capture: Post. Readable text follows below.Download saved screenshot

Alex's Post

Modular Homes Australia

Alex • 1m • €

No apology. No accountability. No resolution.

Just a cease and desist letter and another threat to terminate Mum's contract.

The full update, with all the receipts, is here: https://thegrannyflatfiles.com.au/

Affordable Modular Buildings solicitor sent me a cease and desist accusing me of publishing false

and defamatory material, demanding i take it down and publicly apologise. Our solicitor has now

responded. We completely reject the allegations.

Since then, Tim has publicly said AMB withdrew because we didn't make the next payment and

Expandify therefore couldn't pay them.

Except our email to him at the time expressly said Mum was not refusing to pay. We were refusing

to pay almost $70,000 before the contract said it was due.

So l asked him a pretty simple question:

"If we had paid early, would AMB have stayed on the project and installed Mum's house?"

He's had plenty of time to publicly defend the business and make claims the receipts don't

support. He still hasn't answered that question.

Because if the answer is yes, I think most people would agree that is pretty egregious.

That would mean Mum lost her installation pathway because we wouldn't give in to what I consider

unethical pressure to pay almost $70,000 before the contract said it was due.

Expandify's solicitor has also suggested I take the website down because my public posts are "not

conducive to settlement".

What settlement exactly is what I'd like to know.....

I'd suggest very strongly that the way they are treating their customers is far less conducive to

settlement than me documenting it.

At the same time, Expandify's solicitor has issued another breach notice threatening to terminate

Mum's contract if the next 30% isn't paid by 12 October.

Again, we are not refusing to pay. We offered to put the full amount into their solicitor's trust

account because they still have no nominee and because of the financial risk raised by their own

representative.

They still don't have a nominee. So where the hell is the QBCC?

Mum has already paid more than $130,000 for a home she still doesn't have. If they terminate

anyway, she then has to spend even more of her money on lawyers to fight it.

What is the point of having a building regulator, licensing requirements and consumer protections

if the customer still has to personally fund a legal fight just to make any of it mean something?

Since going public, I've spoken to many Expandify customers who are scared, angry, being ignored

and still waiting. So far, I'm yet to speak to anyone who has had meaningful installation work

progress in the past month.

I didn't build an entire website on a whim. Since April, I've spent what feels like a part-time job on

top of my actual full-time job trying to resolve this privately.

Imagine how far you have to push an ordinary customer before they decide the sensible next step

is to build and publish a website.

I've had enough of businesses getting away with treating people like this.

Everything I've published has been meticulously documented, and l'il continue using my voice,

loudly and publicly, until we get somewhere.

We are scared. This is my mum's life savings. Everything she had. But being scared doesn't mean

being silent.

THE GRANNY FLAT

FILES

THEGRANNYFLATFILES.COM.AU

The Granny Flat Files

Text extracted automatically from the saved screenshots and may contain recognition errors. The screenshots are the source. Overlapping captures are retained where the discussion continues.

Comments

Saved discussion captures through 14 October 2026

Saved capture: Comments. Readable text follows below.Download saved screenshot
Saved capture: Comments. Readable text follows below.Download saved screenshot
Saved capture: Comments. Readable text follows below.Download saved screenshot
Saved capture: Comments. Readable text follows below.Download saved screenshot

Alex's Post

Weaponising the fear of losing a home and life savings. Tying project

completion to us backing away from our solicitor and QBCC involvement.

And now,defensive public claims that don't match the record instead of any

accountability.

I'm not interested in letting that be swept under the rug. Ethical conduct

matters.

21h Like Reply

2 ch

MysticalRabbit9147

I had a builder go bankrupt that did modular buildings in china and I got my full

qbcc deposit back so yes it is absolutely possible.

And okay well that's fair enough but isn't this all just allegations. Haven't seen a

shred of evidence in literally any of your posts.

14h Like Reply

Alex

MysticalRabbit9147 what exactly would you like to see?

Every single claim I've made I have the evidence for.

There are 131 emails, letters, call summaries, invoices, shipping records,

contracts, QBCC license searches all available on

https://thegrannyflatfiles.com.au

X

Comment as Alex

Alex's Post

корку

Alex

MysticalRabbit9147 what exactly would you like to see?

Every single claim I've made I have the evidence for.

There are 131 emails, letters, call summaries, invoices, shipping records,

contracts, QBCC license searches all available on

https://thegrannyflatfiles.com.au

FILE

THEGRANNYFLATFILES.COM.AU

The Granny Flat Files

4h

Like

Reply

Remove preview

Lucas Barry Baker

Are you paying $200k for a expandable out of China? Seems very overpriced for a

container home

7h Like Replyl

Alex

Lucas Barry Baker yes, though to be fair it's quite large and has a lot of custom

add ons. We wouldn't feel ripped off if it'd been installed by now

2h Like Reply

Comment as Alex

Alex's Post

THEGRANNYFLATFILES.COM.AU

The Granny Flat Files

6

All comments -

MysticalRabbit9147

Why don't you contact the QBCC

If the issue is you've paid money and you've gotten nothing then do a Deemed policy

through QBCC and be done with it

Your money issue seems to be with expandify not affordable modular so why the mud

dragging

22h Like Reply

Edited

Alex

MysticalRabbit9147

We have contacted the QBCC. Mum's house was manufactured in China, so

QBCC cover doesn't simply cover the structure itself or refund everything she's

paid

So unfortunately it's not as simple as do a deemed policy and be done with it.

Comment as Alex

Alex's Post

X

22h

Like Reply Edited

Alex

MysticalRabbit9147

We have contacted the QBCC. Mum's house was manufactured in China, so

QBCC cover doesn't simply cover the structure itself or refund everything she's

paid.

So unfortunately it's not as simple as do a deemed policy and be done with it.

But what exactly do you consider mud dragging here?

If you think anything I've published is inaccurate, please tell me specifically

what.

I consider this documented consumer awareness.

We're talking about payment coercion. Ignoring a health-related instruction.

Weaponising the fear of losing a home and life savings. Tying project

completion to us backing away from our solicitor and QBCC involvement.

And now, defensive public claims that don't match the record instead of any

accountability.

I'm not interested in letting that be swept under the rug. Ethical conduct

matters.

21h Like Reply

MuntinalDahhi0117

Comment as Alex

Text extracted automatically from the saved screenshots and may contain recognition errors. The screenshots are the source. Overlapping captures are retained where the discussion continues.

Source limitations

Saved captures, not a guarantee that every historical comment remains visible. Overlapping captures are retained where discussion continues. Publication dates are distinguished from capture dates.