Evidence library · COM-0083
Kay’s solicitor to Expandify’s lawyer: nominee, invoice timing and delay
Source date: 3 Sept 2026 · Email print (redacted)
Kay’s solicitor’s 3 September email requests nominee details and disputes the invoice timing, storage demand and delay explanation.
Kay’s solicitor's sent email of 3 September at 16:46 AEST requests the previous nominee's resignation date and replacement details by noon on 4 September. It disputes the early invoice and storage-cost demand, puts Kay's position that payment is due on 7 September, and challenges the delay explanation against the stated 20–29 week period. The quoted 1 September sending email is retained. The positions expressed are disputed legal submissions, not findings.
Source limitations
Printed from the preserved native email, retaining the email formatting, headers, signatures and relevant quoted thread. Private contact details and addresses are permanently redacted; business email addresses remain. Interactive links are disabled. The native original remains preserved privately. The inter-party sent message is preserved within a forward. The private client covering message is excluded; this print is not a reproduction of the complete client forward. The referenced QBCC licence search and 1 September letter are separate evidence records; this print contains the email thread, not its attachments.